-
Most important WWDC for Apple since the 1990 one that featured a VHS tape with a conference walkaround and a HyperCard stack that cataloged all the attendees.
-
SNES edition of the New Nintendo 3DS XL, with purple Panasonic earbuds whose purple hue matches the mock Power and Reset buttons almost exactly. User-replaceable Li-ion battery; I have three in reserve, you know, just in case.
-
The red queen has ruled
Out not having colorblindness
After seeing this scene and decreeing
It “Another green world”
-
Anything called “content” is in danger, b/c that term centers the platform owner—not the artist. And those owners will, say, remove a bunch of “original content” from their streaming service to reduce their tax bill. This is also why the decline of optical discs, with their quasi-permanence, is bad.
-
So much depends
On an orange cat
Brushed by breeze
By the also-orange bricks
-
Milkweed coming along nicely
-
Retreat? Retreat!
Attic Greek has two words with substantially different meanings that both translate into English as “love.” I won’t spoil the fun; look up their differences, as a little treat.
These types of word complexities reveal an overloadedness to certain English worlds, “free” being another great example 1. So in Greek class 19 years ago, we had a little fun with:
Dikaeopolis loved his pretty plow
Something milder is going on with the word “retreat” as often used by academics and Catholics 2 plus all-remote organizations.
There’s:
- Retreat (nay!): Giving up on your reply-all hell thread, marriage, and so on; painfully generating the grist you’ll need later on for your LinkedIn content mill that’ll become a staple of r/LinkedInLunatics
- Retreat (yay!): Having a long but catered and relatively fun meeting, performing a chill religious ritual, or finally meeting up with the person you’ve only ever seen say “sorry there’s an echo” on Microsoft Teams to have beer 3.
The difference is nicely cleft depending on whether “retreat” is used as a verb (nay!) or a noun (yay!).
But there’s also a “nay/yay” one that straddles these lines for Catholics in particular, I imagine.
The Catholic Church is known for its extreme anti-birth control stance. So someone who’s having presumably a good time but who’s also weirdly orthodox in their views and likes to court some risk could find themselves needing to…beat a retreat, or go on a retreat to stay faithful.
Maybe the plow could help them out?
-
Think “free as in beer” vs “free as in speech,” which necessitated the evolution of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) into Free/Libre and Open Source Software. This issue doesn’t exist in Spanish, which has gratis and libre to differentiate these concepts. ↩︎
-
And academic Catholics?—they’re just perpetually, immaculately retreating. ↩︎
-
Teams is one of the worst macOS apps I’ve ever used. A total energy hog that’s almost always the “reason” in “you’re breaking up for some reason.” ↩︎
-
When you call everything content you treat it as:
- interchangeable
- capable of being made by a machine
- beholden to the container owner
The name of this blog sprung from the (badly mistaken) idea that everything can just be formulaically brewed up in a lab. You can make drivel that way, but not art.
-
Drive My Car was exceptional—my favorite movie of the 2020s so far.
-
The U.S. Constitution and conservative sophistry
Conservatives love to say they’re “originalists” who’re just upholding the sacred principles of the Founders. So you often get disingenuous statements like these that need heavy decoding:
I believe that the Constitution 1 should be interpreted literally 2 and in keeping with the intent of the Founding Fathers 3 at the time of the Founding 4.
-
Only through the 12th Amendment. Amendments 14 and 15 in particular don’t count at all. ↩︎
-
Except for the 2nd Amendment and probably the 8th Amendment, too, while we’re at it. Those get read more…liberally. ↩︎
-
But not the author of the Declaration of Independence (Thomas Jefferson) or the architect of the Constitution (James Madison), who together lost the court case (Marbury v. Madison) that created judicial review. We still love using James' silhouette as the logo of our weirdo legal debating society, though! ↩︎
-
With exactly 9 justices as codified almost 100 years afterward in a law signed by Ulysses Grant, and not with any of the varying numbers that prevailed before that time. ↩︎
-